Aircraft buyer research

Know what to verify before you buy.

Search an FAA registration to resolve the airframe, review the covered public record, and turn evidence gaps into questions for records, title work, and inspection.

One search. Three useful answers.

The result separates what is identified, what the covered sources report, and what a buyer still needs to verify.

  1. 01

    Is this the same airframe?

    Resolve the registration to manufacturer, model, serial evidence, and the physical aircraft before attaching history.

  2. 02

    What does the covered record show?

    Review dated events, service difficulty reporting, and AD applicability with source and coverage attached.

  3. 03

    What is still unverified?

    Carry explicit gaps into logbook review, title work, installed-configuration checks, and inspection.

Aerovidence supports diligence. It does not replace the records, inspections, or professional work required for a purchase.

A buyer's route

From a registration to questions worth asking.

Use public evidence at the right moment—without asking it to prove more than it can.

  1. 01

    Before you shortlist

    Research recurring model reporting and regulatory burden so you know where to look closer.

    Research models
  2. 02

    While you review records

    Cross-check the seller's documents against identity-linked, time-scoped public records.

    See the method
  3. 03

    Before you commit

    Turn missing evidence and candidate differences into inspection, logbook, and title questions.

    Compare aircraft

Model + airframe

Start with the model. Finish with this airframe.

Model context
See recurring reports in a declared cohort and time window—not a failure or reliability rate.
Tail-level record
Attach only identity-supported, time-scoped public records to the aircraft you searched.
Buyer questions
Keep unresolved configuration and missing documents visible as work still to be done.
Explore model research

Compare finalists

Compare aircraft without hiding what is not known.

Every candidate uses the same release, coverage window, and evidence rules. Missing data never becomes the cleaner result.

Start a comparison
  1. 01

    Same basis

    Release, cohort, window, and algorithm versions stay aligned.

  2. 02

    Unknown stays unknown

    Missing records and incomplete configuration remain visible.

  3. 03

    Differences stay traceable

    Material findings retain their source, date coverage, and limitations.

Traceability by design

Every material finding keeps its source, date, and limit.

Primary public sources

Know where each record comes from.

Coverage and limitations stay visible beside the result. A source no-match is never presented as proof that nothing occurred.

FAA Registry

Registration attributes as filed.

Not title or physical condition.

NTSB

Investigated accidents and selected incidents.

No-match applies only to covered data.

FAA SDR

Submitted service difficulty reports.

Not a reliability or failure rate.

FAA AD

Regulatory rules and applicability.

Not aircraft-level compliance.
Review sources and coverage

Start with the aircraft

Search an FAA registration.

Resolve the airframe first. Then review the evidence that can be attached with support.